Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees use.
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender along with the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is founded as well as employee is found guilty after because of process of regulation, it's the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness on the act of misconduct is just not satisfactory though the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in the structured and lawful way. Read more
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden presented to any reported judgment may perhaps rely on the reputation of both the reporter along with the judges.[seven]
We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed because of the Constitution and laws from the United States and this State.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It's also a properly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided construction law case studies under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are definitely the opinions that are filed over the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and in many cases are not the court's final opinion.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the realized counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this element for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It's also a well-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.